Scalp Micropigmentation (SMP) is gaining global popularity as a fast, non-surgical solution for hair loss. However, recent concerns raised in Malaysia and across Southeast Asia spotlight serious red flags with some SMP offerings from China and Korea. While these procedures are marketed as cutting-edge and cost-efficient, many consumers feel misled by aggressive claims, pricing tactics, and lack of regulation.
In this article, we dive into six key reasons why many Malaysians are increasingly cautious about choosing SMP providers using Chinese and Korean technologies or imported pigments.
1. Overclaim: "Only One Session Needed" – But Why It Actually Takes 3–5
A common marketing pitch from some Korean or Chinese SMP centers is that results can be achieved in just one session. This sounds appealing to those hoping for a quick fix, but it’s rarely true.
Why More Sessions Are Usually Required:
Layering Is Essential: Proper SMP requires depth layering for natural gradient effects.
Pigment Settling: After the first session, the pigment fades up to 30–50%, requiring touch-ups.
Skin Response Varies: Healing times and absorption differ by skin type and scalp condition.
Longevity Requires Reinforcement: For lasting, natural-looking results, 3 to 5 sessions are typically necessary.
So while providers may attract clients with the promise of a "one-session miracle," the real clinical process tells another story.
2. Bait Pricing: RM1,200 to Start—RM4,000–RM5,000 to Finish
Another tactic commonly reported is bait pricing. Some SMP centers advertise prices as low as RM1,200 for a full treatment, but here’s the reality:
That RM1,200 usually covers only the first session.
Once the pigment fades and patchiness sets in, clients are advised to return—often quoted another RM1,000–RM2,000 per session.
By the third or fourth visit, the total bill quietly climbs to RM4,000–RM5,000.
This non-transparent sales funnel leads many customers to feel tricked or financially trapped midway through their treatment.
3. Lack of Transparent Pricing Structures
Unlike medically supervised SMP providers who offer clear packages upfront, some centers using Korean or Chinese systems operate in a gray area of vague estimates and “assessment-based” quoting.
Consumers are often:
Not told how many sessions are required from the start
Given inconsistent pricing depending on who they speak to
Offered promotions that disappear upon actual consultation
This inconsistency causes trust issues and makes it harder for clients to plan or compare value.
4. Unregulated Pigment Ingredients: Not Registered with NPRA KKM
Perhaps the most serious concern is about the ingredients in imported SMP pigments, especially those from certain Korean and Chinese brands.
In Malaysia, all cosmetics and pigmentation products must be registered with NPRA (National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency) under the Ministry of Health (KKM). However:
Some providers falsely claim registration is not necessary
Others insist their pigments are "safe," but refuse to show NPRA approval documents
There are reports of adverse reactions such as redness, inflammation, and long-term discoloration
Choosing unregistered pigments is a legal and health risk. Without NPRA oversight, there's no assurance the ingredients are sterile, stable, or skin-compatible for Malaysian users.
5. Misleading Organic Claims: 100% Organic Pigment? Not Possible
Many China and Korea-based SMP providers claim their pigments are “100% organic.”
Here’s the truth:
No SMP pigment is fully organic. All pigmentation products require synthetic stabilizers, binders, and color agents to last in the dermal layer.
“Organic” in cosmetic marketing often means “plant-based additives,” but it doesn’t guarantee safety, purity, or effectiveness.
In reality, 100% organic pigments cannot hold color effectively in scalp tissue over time and would be prone to fading or contamination.
Such exaggerated marketing creates false expectations and undermines customer trust.
6. SMP Devices from China and Korea Use Single Needle—But Claim Follicle Activation?
One of the most misleading claims is that SMP using Korean or Chinese single-needle equipment can “activate hair follicles.”
Why This Claim Is Scientifically Unfounded:
Single-needle SMP is cosmetic, not medical. It deposits pigment just below the epidermis to simulate hair, not stimulate growth.
It does not penetrate deep enough to activate dermal papilla or influence the hair cycle.
No blood stimulation, no healing response—both crucial for follicle reactivation.
Why Roller Microneedling Is Effective Instead:
Uses multiple micro-needles to puncture the skin at deeper, uniform depths
Triggers controlled micro-injury that stimulates collagen production and blood flow
Enhances absorption of growth serums like PRP or peptides
Scientifically supported for stimulating dormant hair follicles
The bottom line: SMP with a single-needle device is visual only. It cannot and does not biologically revive follicles. Roller-based microneedling, however, has clinical support for doing just that.
Final Thoughts: Choose SMP Providers with Integrity
The concerns raised above don’t mean all SMP providers from China or Korea are bad—but they do highlight the importance of transparency, regulation, and medically guided procedures.
When considering SMP in Malaysia, especially in areas like Kuala Lumpur, Petaling Jaya, or Johor Bahru:
Ask for NPRA-registered pigment certification
Request a complete session plan and cost estimate
Be skeptical of "1-session-only" promises
Look for trichologists or medically affiliated centers
Understand that single-needle SMP is cosmetic—not therapeutic
SMP can be a life-changing procedure—if done right. Don’t fall for shortcuts, and never trade health for hype.
Share this post